William Labov – 1966 New York Study – individual speech
patterns are “part of a highly systematic structure of social and
stylistic stratification”
– Labov studied how often the final or preconsonantal (r) was
sounded in words like guard, bare and beer. Use of this variable has
considerable prestige in New York City.
– The speech of sales assistants in three Manhattan stores,
drawn from the top (Saks), middle (Macy’s) and bottom (Klein’s) of the
price and fashion scale. Each unwitting informant was approached with a
factual enquiry designed to elicit the answer – “Fourth floor” – which
may or may not contain the variable final or preconsonantal (r). A
pretence not to have heard it obtained a repeat performance in careful,
emphatic style.
– Frequency of use of the prestige variable final or
preconsonantal “r” varied with level of formality and social class – the
sales assistants from Saks used it most, those from Klein’s used it
least and those from Macy’s showed the greatest upward shift when they
were asked to repeat.
– Of the four classes tested – Lower Class, Working Class,
Lower Middle Class & Upper Middle Class – it was the lower middle
class that were most susceptible to the overt prestige of the
preconsonantal “r” – as they differed the most between the incidence in
casual speech style (4%) to most careful speech style (77%).
– That the Upper Middle Class cohort differed least between the
casual and careful speech styles – (19% in casual and 60% in careful),
showed that they were least susceptible to the prestige form, changing
the way they spoke less than any other social class when thinking
carefully about how they spoke.
– All of the 3 lower classes: Lower Class, Working Class &
Lower Middle Class are more aware of the prestige of the preconsonantal
“r” , and when they think about it are more likely to change the way
they speak to reflect “how they should sound” or how “post people sound”
good bye
ReplyDeleteYou okay bro?
Delete